ROUPA VELHA E ROUPA NOVA

 ROUPA VELHA E ROUPA NOVA

Lucas 5:29 E fez-lhe Levi um grande banquete em sua casa; e havia ali uma multidão de publicanos e outros que estavam com eles à mesa. 30 E os escribas deles, e os fariseus, murmuravam contra os seus discípulos, dizendo: Por que comeis e bebeis com publicanos e pecadores? 31 E Jesus, respondendo, disse-lhes: Não necessitam de médico os que estão sãos, mas, sim, os que estão enfermos; 32 Eu não vim chamar os justos, mas, sim, os pecadores, ao arrependimento.

Os Publicanos eram pessoas da região que trabalhavam para Roma na cobrança de Impostos e tinham a fama de serem avarentos, egoístas e que extorquiam as  pessoas. 

Este Levi citado acima, é autor do Evangelho segundo Mateus, que era também Cobrador de Impostos, um Publicano. 

Os escribas eram considerados doutores e mestres da Lei. Os fariseus, eram exigentes pela observância rígida da Lei escrita  e da tradição oral, participavam dos cerimoniais religiosos com afinco. Jogavam uma carga de religiosidade sobre o povo que nem mesmo eles eram capazes de cumprir. 

Médicos, os que estão com saúde, não necessitam de médicos. Mas aí se trata da saúde espiritual, ninguém ali estava doente fisicamente, senão, não estariam em um banquete. De mais a mais, Jesus foi irônico com os escribas e fariseus. Jesus estava dizendo: Eu não vim para vocês que se acham e se consideram justos e tão saudáveis espiritualmente a ponto de não precisarem de médicos.

Pecadores, ao arrependimento. Eu vim para aqueles que querem fazer um exame de consciência e chegar ao arrependimento e Nascer de Novo ou seja se torne uma Nova Criatura, um Novo Homem.

Lucas 5:36 Propôs-lhes também esta comparação: Ninguém rasga um pedaço de roupa nova para remendar uma roupa velha, porque assim estragaria uma roupa nova. Além disso, o remendo novo não assentaria bem na roupa velha. 37 Também ninguém põe vinho novo em odres velhos; do contrário, o vinho novo arrebentará os odres e entornar-se-á, e perder-se-ão os odres; 38 mas o vinho novo deve-se pôr em odres novos, e assim ambos se conservam. 39 Demais, ninguém que bebeu do vinho velho quer já do novo, porque diz: O vinho velho é melhor.

Roupa nova e Roupa velha. Remendar uma roupa velha com pedaço do pano da roupa nova. Já se estragou a que estava nova e a velha não iria suportar e nem combinar com o pedaço novo. 

Odres velhos. Significa o Velho Homem, o maduro e experiente, o formado por si só e Vinho Novo, significa as Boas Novas, o  Evangelho de Jesus. Portanto o Velho Homem tem que morrer para dar lugar ao Novo Homem para poder receber o  Vinho Novo, o Evangelho de Jesus e assim os dois envelhecerem juntos e não se estragarem. Se recebermos as Boas Novas no Velho Homem, haverá uma mistura das coisas velhas e novas e nenhum dos dois se conservará. Assim como o Odre Velho ao receber o Vinho Novo, o vinho virá a se fermentar, aumentará de tamanho e o Odre Velho não suportará e os dois se perderão. 

O Vinho velho é melhor. Com isso, as boas novas e o Novo homem envelhecerão juntos e todos desejarão beber desse Vinho velho, que é o Evangelho que sai da sua boca, pois ele já estará maduro, estará robusto, genuíno e alcançará muitos. O Vinho Velho é melhor.

A Body of Divinity

A Body of Divinity

by

Thomas Watson

Table of Contents

About This Book. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. ii

A Body of Divinity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 1

Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 2

Brief Memoir Of Thomas Watson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 4

1. A Preliminary Discourse To Catechising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 9

2. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 13

1. Man’s Chief End . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 13

2. The Scriptures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 26

3. God and his creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 35

1. The Being Of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 35

2. The Knowledge Of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 45

3. The Eternity Of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 49

4. The Unchangeableness Of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 53

5. The Wisdom Of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 57

6. The Power Of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 61

7. The Holiness Of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 64

8. The Justice Of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 68

9. The Mercy Of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 72

10. The Truth Of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 76

11. The Unity Of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 79

12. The Trinity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 82

13. The Creation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 85

14. The Providence Of God . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 89

4. The fall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 96

1. The Covenant Of Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 96

2. Adam’s Sin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 102

3. Original Sin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 105

4. Man's Misery By The Fall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 110

5. The covenant of grace and its mediator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 114

1. The Covenant Of Grace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 114

2. Christ The Mediator Of The Covenant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 119

3. Christ's Prophetic Office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 122

4. Christ's Priestly Office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 126

5. Christ's Kingly Office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 136

6. Christ’s Humiliation In His Incarnation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 140

iii

A Body of Divinity Thomas Watson

7. Christ’s Exaltation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 148

8. Christ The Redeemer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 152

6. The application of redemption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 156

1. Faith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 156

2. Effectual Calling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 159

3. Justification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 163

4. Adoption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 167

5. Sanctification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 173

6. Assurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 180

7. Peace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 187

8. Joy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 192

9. Growth In Grace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 196

10. Perseverance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 200

7. Death and the last day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 208

1. The Death Of The Righteous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 208

2. A Believer’s Privilege At Death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 211

3. The Resurrection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 218

Indexes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 227

Index of Scripture References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p. 227

iv

A Body of Divinity Thomas Watson

A Body of Divinity

Contained In Sermons Upon The Westminster Assembly’s Catechism

By Thomas Watson

A Body of Divinity Thomas Watson

Contents

•1. Brief Memoir Of Thomas Watson

•2. A Preliminary Discourse To Catechising

•3. Introduction

•3.1. Man’s Chief End

•3.2. The Scriptures

•4. God and his creation

•4.1. The Being Of God

•4.2. The Knowledge Of God

•4.3. The Eternity Of God

•4.4. The Unchangeableness Of God

•4.5. The Wisdom Of God

•4.6. The Power Of God

•4.7. The Holiness Of God

•4.8. The Justice Of God

•4.9. The Mercy Of God

•4.10. The Truth Of God

•4.11. The Unity Of God

•4.12. The Trinity

•4.13. The Creation

•4.14. The Providence Of God

•5. The fall

•5.1. The Covenant Of Works

•5.2. Adam’s Sin

•5.3. Original Sin

•5.4. Man’s Misery By The Fall

•6. The covenant of grace and its mediator

•6.1. The Covenant Of Grace

•6.2. Christ The Mediator Of The Covenant

•6.3. Christ’s Prophetic Office

•6.4. Christ’s Priestly Office

•6.5. Christ’s Kingly Office

•6.6. Christ’s Humiliation In His Incarnation

•6.7. Christ’s Exaltation

•6.8. Christ The Redeemer

•7. The application of redemption

•7.1. Faith

•7.2. Effectual Calling

•7.3. Justification

•7.4. Adoption

•7.5. Sanctification

2

A Body of Divinity Thomas Watson

•7.6. Assurance

•7.7. Peace

•7.8. Joy

•7.9. Growth In Grace

•7.10. Perseverance

•8. Death and the last day

•8.1. The Death Of The Righteous

•8.2. A Believer’s Privilege At Death

•8.3. The Resurrection

3

A Body of Divinity Thomas Watson

Brief Memoir Of Thomas Watson

Compiled by C. H. Spurgeon

Thomas Watson’s Body of Practical Divinity is one of the most precious of the peerless works

of the Puritans; and those best acquainted with it prize it most. Watson was one of the most concise,

racy, illustrative, and suggestive of those eminent divines who made the Puritan age the Augustan

period of evangelical literature. There is a happy union of sound doctrine, heart-searching experience

and practical wisdom throughout all his works, and his Body of Divinity is, beyond all the rest,

useful to the student and the minister. Although Thomas Watson issued several most valuable

books, comparatively little is known of him - even the dates of his birth and death are unknown.

His writings are his best memorial; perhaps he needed no other, and therefore providence forbade

the superfluity. We shall not attempt to discover his pedigree, and, after the manner of antiquarians,

derive his family from a certain famous Wat, whose son distinguished himself in the Crusades, or

in some other insane enterprise; whether blue blood was in his veins or no is of small consequence,

since we know that he was the seed-royal of the redeemed of the Lord. Some men are their own

ancestors, and, for ought we know, Thomas Watson’s genealogy reflected no fame upon him, but

derived all its lustre from his achievements. He had the happiness to be educated at Emmanuel

College, Cambridge, which in those days deserved to be called the School of Saints, the nursing

mother of gigantic evangelical divines. In Kennet’s ‘Register and Chronicle,’ is a list of eighty-seven

names of Puritan ministers, including many well-known and loved as preachers and commentators;

such as Anth. Burgess, W. Jenkyn, Ralph Venning, Thomas Brooks, T. White, Samuel Slater,

Thomas Watson, John Rowe, Dr. W. Bates, Stephen Charnock, Samuel Clarke, Nathaniel Vincent,

Dr John Collings, William Bridge, Samuel Hildersam, Adoniram Bifield, followed by this remark,

‘These are most of them mentioned in the list of sufferers for Nonconformity, and appear upon the

registers to have been all of Emmanuel College, beside great numbers, no doubt of the same society,

who were forward preachers up of the unhappy changes of 1641,’ etc. In the margin of the book is

the following observation on the foregoing: ‘It may not be improper to observe how much young

students, in both Universities, fell in with the prejudices of their governors and tutors. This was the

reason that this single College of Emmanuel, in Cambridge, bred more of the Puritans and

Nonconformists than perhaps any seven of the other Colleges or Halls in either University.” Such

a fact as this should attract the prayers of all believers to our seminaries for the sons of the prophets,

since upon the manner in which these institutions are conducted will depend under God the future

well-being of our churches. The Pastors, College, for the use of whose students this work is

published, earnestly petitions for a place in the intercessions of the saints.

We are not at all surprised to learn that Thomas Watson enjoyed the repute, while at Cambridge,

of being a most laborious student; the great Puritanic authors must have been most industrious

workers at the university, or they never would have become such pre-eminent masters in Israel.

The conscientious student is the most likely man to become a successful preacher. After completing

his course with honour, Watson became rector of St Stephen’s, Walbrook, where in the very heart

of London he executed for nearly sixteen years the office of a faithful pastor with great diligence

and assiduity. Happy were the citizens who regularly attended so instructive and spiritual a ministry.

The church was constantly filled, for the fame and popularity of the preacher were deservedly great.

Going in and out among his flock, fired with holy zeal for their eternal welfare, his years rolled on

4

A Body of Divinity Thomas Watson

pleasantly enough amid the growing respect of all who knew him. Calamy, in his Nonconformist

Memorial, says of him: - ‘He was so well known in the city for his piety and usefulness, that though

he was singled out by the Friendly Debate, he yet carried a general respect from all sober persons

along with him to his grave. He was a man of considerable reaming, a popular, but judicious preacher

(if one may judge from his writings), and eminent in the gift of prayer. Of this, the following

anecdote is a sufficient proof. Once on a lecture day, before the Bartholomew Act took place, the

learned Bishop Richardson came to hear him at St Stephen’s, who was much pleased with his

sermon, but especially with his prayer after it, so that he followed him home to give him thanks,

and earnestly desired a copy of his prayer. “Alas!” (said Mr Watson) “that is what I cannot give,

for I do not use to pen my prayers; it was no studied thing, but uttered, pro re nata, as God enabled

me, from the abundance of my heart and affections.” Upon which the good Bishop went away

wondering that any man could pray in that manner extempore.

But the hand which of old had oppressed the church was again stretched forth to vex certain of

the saints. The most learned, holy, and zealous of the clergy of the Church of England found that

the Act of Uniformity would not allow them to preserve a clean conscience and retain their livings,

and therefore they submitted to the loss of all things for Christ’s sake. Thomas Watson did not

hesitate as to the course he should pursue. He was not a factious hater of royalty, a red republican,

or fifth monarchy-man; in fact, he had in Cromwell’s day been all too loyal to the house of Stuart;

he had protested against the execution of the King, and had joined in Love’s plot for the bringing

in of Charles II; yet all this availed nothing, he was a Puritan, and therefore must not be tolerated

by the bitter spirits then dominant in the Establishment. What seeds of discord were sown on that

black Bartholomew history has not had space to record; yet the ultimate results have been fraught

with results scarcely then imaginable. Comprehension might have hindered truth; the crown rights

of King Jesus might have lacked advocates had monarchs and priests been more tolerant; as it was

good men were forced into a truer position than they would otherwise have occupied, and the

beginning of a real reformation was inaugurated. From that commencement in suffering what

progress has been made! Every day the cause of the ejected gathers force and pushes on its adversary

towards the brink of the precipice, a down which all establishments must fall.

With many tears and lamentations the congregation of St Stephen’s saw their shepherd about

to be removed from his flock, and with aching hearts they listened to his parting words. He himself

speaking as one bereaved of his dearest delight, and yet suffering joyfully the loss of all things,

bade them adieu, and went forth ‘not knowing whither he went.’

In the collection of Farewell Sermons there are three by Mr Watson, viz.: two delivered August

17th, and the third on the Tuesday following. The first, preached in the forenoon, is on John 13:34.

‘A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another.’ It discovers much of the spirit

of the gospel, particularly in recommending love to enemies and persecutors. The second, preached

in the afternoon, is on 2 Corinthians 7:7. ‘Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us

cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.’

In the former part of it, he insists largely on ‘the ardent affections of a right gospel minister towards

his people.’ This head he closes thus: ‘I have now exercised my ministry among you for almost

sixteen years; and I rejoice and bless God that I cannot say, the more I love you, the less I am loved:

I have received many signal demonstrations of love from you. Though other parishes have exceeded

you in number of houses, yet, I think, none for strength of affection. I have with much comfort

observed your reverent attention to the word preached; you rejoice in this light, not for a season,

5

A Body of Divinity Thomas Watson

but to this day. I have observed your zeal against error in a critical time, your unity and amity. This

is your honour. If there should be any interruption in my ministry among you, though I should not

be permitted to preach to you again, yet I shall not cease to love you, and to pray for you. But why

should there be any interruption made? Where is the crime? Some, indeed, say that we are disloyal

and seditious. Beloved, what my actions and sufferings for his Majesty have been is known to not

a few of you. However, we must go to heaven through good report and bad report; and it is well if

we can get to glory, though we press through the pikes. I shall endeavour that I may still approve

the sincerity of my love to you. I will not promise that I shall still preach among you, nor will I say

that I shall not. I desire to be guided by the silver thread of God’s word and providence. My heart

is towards you. There is, you know, an expression in the late Act, “that we shall now shortly be as

if we were naturally dead;’’ and if I must die, let me leave some legacy with you. Then follow

twenty admirable directions, well worthy the fervent perusal of every Christian. He closes them

thus: ‘I beseech you treasure them up as so many jewels in the cabinet of your breasts. Did you

carry them about you, they would be an antidote to keep you from sin, and a means to preserve the

zeal of piety flaming upon the altar of your hearts. I have many things yet to say to you, but I know

not whether God will give another opportunity. My strength is now almost gone. I beseech you,

let these things make deep impressions on all your souls. Consider what has been said, and the Lord

give you understanding in all things.’

The last discourse, August 19th, is on Isaiah 3:30, 11. ‘Say ye t0 the righteous, that it shall be

well with him: for they shall eat the fruit of their doings. Woe unto the wicked! it shall be ill with

him, for the reward of his hands shall be given him.’

After his ejectment, Watson preached occasionally whenever he could do so with safety. Fines

and imprisonments were insufficient to close the mouths of the witnesses of Jesus. In barns, kitchens,

outhouses, or dells and woods, the faithful few gathered to hear the message of eternal life. Those

little secret assemblies were doubtless charming occasions for devout minds: the word of the Lord

was precious in those days. Bread eaten in secret is proverbially sweet, and the word of God in

persecution is peculiarly delightful. Little can we realise the joyful anticipation which preceded the

appointed meetings, or the lingering memories which clung to them long after they were over. After

the great fire in 1666, when the churches were burned, Mr Watson and several other Nonconformists

fitted up large rooms for those who had an inclination to attend. Upon the Indulgence, in 1672, he

licensed the great hall in Crosby House, on the east side of Bishopsgatestreet, then belonging to

Sir John Langham (a Nonconformist). It was a happy circumstance that the worthy baronet favoured

the cause of Nonconformity, and that so noble a chamber was at his disposal. Here Watson preached

for several years. Rev Stephen Charnock, B.D.’ became joint pastor with him at Crosby Hall in

1675, and continued so till his death in 1680. What two shepherds for the flock! Men of such most

extraordinary gifts and graces were seldom if ever united in one pastorate. They both attempted a

Body of Divinity, and the goodly volume on the Divine Attributes was Charnock’s first stone of a

colossal structure which he was not spared to complete. Our author was more modest in his attempt

and the present volume shows how he succeeded.

Mr Watson at length returned to Essex, where he died suddenly, in his closet at prayer, as is

supposed, about 1689 or 1690. The time either of his birth or death is nowhere mentioned.

In the life of Colonel James Gardiner, there is this remarkable account: ‘In July, 1719, he had

spent the evening, which was the Sabbath, in some gay company, and had an unhappy assignation

with a married lady, whom he was to attend exactly at twelve. The company broke up about eleven,

6

A Body of Divinity Thomas Watson

and he went into his chamber to kill the tedious hour. It happened that he took up a religious book,

which his good mother or aunt had, without his knowledge, slipped into his portmanteau, called,

“The Christian Soldier,” written by Mr Watson. Guessing by the title that he should find some

phrases of his own profession spiritualised in a manner which might afford him some diversion,

he resolved to dip into it: while this book was in his hand, an impression was made upon his mind,

which drew after it a train of the most important consequences. Suddenly he thought he saw an

unusual blaze of light fall on the book while he was reading, and lifting up his eyes, he apprehended,

to his extreme amazement, that there was before him, as it were suspended in the air, a visible

representation of the Lord Jesus Christ upon the cross, surrounded with a glory, and was impressed

as if a voice had come to him, to this effect: “O sinner, did I suffer this for thee, and are these thy

returns?” He sunk down in his chair, and continued for some time insensible. He then arose in a

tumult of passions, and walked to and fro in his chamber, till he was ready to drop, in unutterable

astonishment and agony of heart, which continued until the October following, when his terrors

were turned into unutterable joy.’

Mr Watson published a variety of books upon practical subjects, and of a useful nature, for the

titles of which, see foot-note.* But his principal work was a body of divinity, in one hundred and

seventy-six sermons, upon the Assembly’s Catechism, which did not appear till after his death. It

was published in one volume folio, in 1692, and accompanied with a portrait of the author, by Sturt;

together with a recommendatory preface by the Rev William Lorimer, and the attestation of

twenty-five other ministers of principal note in that day. For many a year this volume continued to

train the common people in theology, and it may still tee found very commonly in the cottages of

the Scottish peasantry. Rev George Rogers, Principal of the Pastors, College, has carefully

superintended the issue of this present edition, and in a note to us he writes: ‘I know of no work

with so much sermon matter within the same compass. In Howe, and Charnock, and Owen, we

must often read much before we are tempted to close the book and think out a whole sermon, but

Watson teaches us to make short work of it. The whole may be utilised. On this account it would

be, I think, of great value to all our students who have pastorates. It is for their benefit, I suppose,

you wished the reprint. As several select sermons, which are usually bound up with this work, will

appear with his whole works, after a time, in Nichol’s series, they are not included here. This is a

distinct work by itself and complete. All editions extant which we have seen, abound in errors and

imperfections. These have been rectified, not entirely we fear, but in a degree as nearly approaching

to accuracy as in revision of another’s composition could be expected. No alteration of sentiment

has been made, but every shade of the author’s meaning has been scrupulously retained. The style

has been modernised, so far as could be done without detracting from its own peculiar characteristics.

Long sentences have been divided into two or three, where it could be done without injury to the

clearness or force of the signification. Modern words have been substituted for such as had become

obsolete; Latin quotations restored to their correct form, as far as their sources could be ascertained;

and divisions of subjects more perspicuously arranged. The whole, in fact, has been rendered more

readable, and consequently more attractive and intelligible, which in our estimation far outweighs

all the supposed advantages that could arise from perpetuating the crudities and vulgarities, as they

now appear to us, of former times. By popularising ancient works, their readers are multiplied and

their meaning may often be more readily apprehended’.

* The following are the tides of the principal works of Thomas Watson: viz. Three treatises: 1.

‘The Christian’s Charter.’ 2. ‘The Art of Divine Contentment.’ 3. ‘A Discourse of Meditation,’ to

7

A Body of Divinity Thomas Watson

which is added several sermons, 1660. This volume contains, besides the three treatises, the

following, viz.: ‘God’s Anatomy upon Man’s Heart,’ ‘The Saint’s Delight,’ ‘A Christian on Earth

still in Heaven,’ ‘Christ’s Loveliness,’ ‘The Upright Man’s Character and Crown,’ ‘The One Thing

Necessary,’ ‘The Holy Longing; or, the Saint’s Desire to be with Christ,’ ‘Beatitudes; or, a Discourse

upon part of Christ’s Famous Sermon upon the Mount,’ 1660, ‘A Body of Practical Divinity,’ etc.’

with a supplement of some sermons, ‘A Divine Cordial,” The Holy Eucharist,’ ‘Heaven taken by

Storm,’ etc.’ etc.

8

A Body of Divinity Thomas Watson

1. A Preliminary Discourse To Catechising

’If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled.’ - Col 1:13.

Intending next Lord’s day to enter upon the work of catechising, it will not be amiss to give

you a preliminary discourse, to show you how needful it is for Christians to be well instructed in

the grounds of religion. ‘If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled.’

I. It is the duty of Christians to be settled in the doctrine of faith.

II. The best way for Christians to be settled is to be well grounded.

I. It is the duty of Christians to be settled in the doctrine of faith. It is the apostle’s prayer, I Pet

5:50, ’The God of all grace stablish, strengthen, settle you.’ That is, that they might not be meteors

in the air, but fixed stars. The apostle Jude speaks of ‘wandering stars, in verse 13. They are called

wandering stars, because, as Aristotle says, ‘They do leap up and down, and wander into several

parts of the heaven; and being but dry exhalations, not made of that pure celestial matter as the

fixed stars are, they often fall to the earth.’ Now, such as are not settled in religion, will, at one

time or other, prove wandering stars; they will lose their former steadfastness, and wander from

one opinion to another. Such as are unsettled are of the tribe of Reuben, ‘unstable as water,’ Gen

49:9; like a ship without ballast, overturned with every wind of doctrine. Beza writes of one

Belfectius, that his religion changed as the moon. The Arians had every year a new faith. These

are not pillars in the temple of God, but reeds shaken every way. The apostle calls them ‘damnable

heresies.’ 2 Pet 2:2. A man may go to hell as well for heresy as adultery. To be unsettled in religion,

argues want of judgement. If their heads were not giddy, men would not reel so fast from one

opinion to another. It argues lightness. As feathers will be blown every way, so will feathery

Christians. Triticum non rapit ventus inanes palae jactantur. Cyprian. Therefore such are compared

to children. Eph 4:44. ‘That we be no more children, tossed to and fro.’ Children are fickle sometimes

of one mind sometimes of another, nothing pleases them long; so unsettled Christians are childish;

the truths they embrace at one time, they reject at another; sometimes they like the Protestant

religion, and soon after they have a good mind to turn Papists.

[I] It is the great end of the word preached, to bring us to a settlement in religion. Eph 4:41, 12,

14. ‘And he gave some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; for the edifying of the body

of Christ; that we henceforth be no more children.’ The word is called a hammer. Jer 23:39. Every

blow of the hammer is to fasten the nails of the building; so the preacher’s words are to fasten you

the more to Christ; they weaken themselves to strengthen and settle you. This is the grand design

of preaching, not only for the enlightening, but for the establishing of souls; not only to guide them

in the right way, but to keep them in it. Now, if you be not settled, you do not answer God’s end

in giving you the ministry.

[2] To be settled in religion is both a Christian’s excellence and honour. It is his excellence.

When the milk is settled it turns to cream; now he will be zealous for the truth, and walk in close

communion with God. And his honour. Prov 16:61. ‘The hoary head is a crown of glory, if it be

found in the way of righteousness.’ It is one of the best sights to see an old disciple; to see silver

hairs adorned with golden virtues.

[3] Such as are not settled in the faith can never suffer for it. Sceptics in religion hardly ever

prove martyrs. They that are not settled hang in suspense; when they think of the joys of heaven

they will espouse the gospel, but when they think of persecution they desert it. Unsettled Christians

9

A Body of Divinity Thomas Watson

do not consult what is best, but what is safest. ‘The apostate (says Tertullian) seems to put God and

Satan in balance, and having weighed both their services, prefers the devil’s service, and proclaims

him to be the best master: and, in this sense, may be said to put Christ to open shame.’ Heb 6:6.

He will never suffer for the truth, but be as a soldier that leaves his colours, and runs over to the

enemy’s side; he will fight on the devil’s side for pay.

[4] Not to be settled in the faith is provoking to God. To espouse the truth, and then to fall away,

brings an ill report upon the gospel, which will not go unpunished. Psa 78:87, 59. ‘They turned

back, and dealt unfaithfully. When God heard this, he was wroth, and greatly abhorred Israel.’ The

apostate drops as a wind-fall into the devil’s mouth.

[5] If ye are not settled in religion, you will never grow. We are commanded ‘to grow up into

the head, even Christ.’ Eph 4:15. But if we are unsettled there is no growing: ‘the plant which is

continually removing never thrives.’ He can no more grow in godliness, who is unsettled, than a

bone can grow in the body that is out of joint.

[6] There is great need to be settled, because there are so many things to unsettle us. Seducers

are abroad, whose work is to draw away people from the principles of religion. I John 2:26. ‘These

things have I written unto you concerning them that seduce you.’ Seducers are the devil’s factors;

they are of all others the greatest felons that would rob you of the truth. Seducers have silver tongues,

that can put off bad wares; they have a sleight to deceive. Eph 4:14. The Greek word there is taken

from those that can throw dice, and cast them for the best advantage. So seducers are impostors,

they can throw a dice; they can so dissemble and sophisticate the truth, that they can deceive others.

Seducers deceive by wisdom of words. Rom 16:68. ‘By good words and fair speeches they deceive

the hearts of the simple.’ They have fine elegant phrases, flattering language, whereby they work

on the weaker sort. Another sleight is a pretence of extraordinary piety, that so people may admire

them, and suck in their doctrine. They seem to be men of zeal and sanctity, and to be divinely

inspired, and pretend to new revelations. A third cheat of seducers is, labouring to vilify and nullify

sound orthodox teachers. They would eclipse those that bring the truth, like black vapours that

darken the light of heaven; they would defame others, that they themselves may be more admired.

Thus the false teachers cried down Paul, that they might be received, Gal 4:17. The fourth cheat

of seducers is, to preach the doctrine of liberty; as though men are freed from the moral law, the

rule as well as the curse, and Christ has done all for them, and they need to do nothing. Thus they

make the doctrine of free grace a key to open the door to all licentiousness. Another means is, to

unsettle Christians by persecution. 2 Tim 3:12. The gospel is a rose that cannot be plucked without

prickles. The legacy Christ has bequeathed is the CROSS. While there is a devil and a wicked man

in the world, never expect a charter of exemption from trouble. How many fall away in an hour of

persecution! Rev 12:2. ‘There appeared a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns; and

his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven.’ The red dragon, by his power and subtilty, drew

away stars, or eminent professors, that seemed to shine as stars in the firmament of the church.

To be unsettled in good is the sin of the devils. Jude 6. They are called, ‘morning stars,’ Job

38:8, but ‘falling stars;’ they were holy, but mutable. As the vessel is overturned with the sail, so

their sails being swelled with pride, they were overturned. I Tim 3:3. By unsettledness, men imitate

lapsed angels. The devil was the first apostate. The sons of Sion should be like mount Sion, which

cannot be removed.

II. The second proposition is, that the way for Christians to be settled is to be well grounded.

‘If ye continue grounded and settled.’ The Greek word for grounded is a metaphor which alludes

10

Jesus disse

Jesus disse em alta voz às multidões: "Se vocês creem em mim, 

não creem apenas em mim, 

mas também naquele que me enviou.

Pois, quando veem a mim, veem aquele que me enviou.
Eu vim como luz para brilhar neste mundo, 

a fim de que todo aquele que crê em mim não 

permaneça na escuridão.

Não julgarei aqueles que me ouvem mas não me obedecem, 

pois vim para salvar o mundo, e não para julgá-lo.
Mas todos que me rejeitam e desprezam minha mensagem 

serão julgados no dia do julgamento pela verdade que tenho falado.
Não falo com minha própria autoridade. O Pai, que me enviou, 

me ordenou o que dizer. E eu sei que o 

mandamento dele conduz à vida eterna; 

por isso digo tudo que o Pai me mandou dizer".

João 12:44-49

Ceia do Senhor sobre Ataque. Lord's Supper on Attack.

Satan will Continue to Attack the Lord’s Supper by Jeremy James Several years ago, not long after I was saved, I heard a comment  by Vernon McGee in his ‘Through the Bible’ series which struck me as especially important. 

The truth of his observation became more evident as the years passed. No sermon is  ever  complete, he said, if it fails to refer to Resurrection Sunday. This is the glorious truth of Christianity, a truth so great and immeasurably broad that we will never fully grasp it, no matter how we try. 

We must hold it before us continually if we are to understand all the doctrines and precious promises that flow from it. The great task and privilege of every preacher is to remind their listeners of this remarkable moment, this day of days, when Jesus rose from the dead and set in motion a process which, when it runs to completion, will see the perfect restoration of the whole of creation. 

This is the day the LORD has made The Psalmist referred to this day as follows: “This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it.” (Psalm 118:24 It is exalted above all days, a tiny slice of time in the course of history when everything – absolutely everything – changed forever. The contrast between the millennia that passed before it and those that were yet to come could not have been greater. 

The reality of everything that Jesus had accomplished on Calvary would now become manifest to a fallen world.  When Satan ordered the closure of our churches in 2020 as part of his ‘Covid’ mandate, he wanted men and women all over the earth to stop commemorating this wonderful day. Professing Christians were permitted to play ‘church’ online via Zoom, but they could do nothing in cyber space to counterfeit the Lord’s Supper. 

The scriptural basis for the Lord’s Supper We are all familiar with the scriptural basis for the Lord’s Supper, but it helps from time to time to reflect on why our Lord asked us to celebrate it. When he shared the bread and wine at the last supper Jesus said: “...this do in remembrance of me” - “And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. 

Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.” (Luke 22:19-20) Through our celebration of the Lord’s Supper we are remembering what Jesus achieved for us through his death and resurrection. Our thoughts turn with delight to “the day which the LORD hath made.” And, as the Psalmist foretold, “we will rejoice and be glad in it.” 

The Eleven Apostles listening to Jesus at the Last Supper. Detail of a painting by Duccio di Buoninsegna, 14th century 3 We set out in Appendix A a number of edifying extracts from the writings of H A Ironside which reveal the essential nature and purpose of the Lord’s Supper. He points to several truths which, I suspect, many professing Christians today have largely forgotten or never fully understood. The main facts to note about the Lord’s Supper is that, along with Baptism, it is a defining ordinance of Christianity and is to be celebrated regularly by all believers. 

The scriptures on which it is based emphasize its deep spiritual significance. It was instituted by Jesus at the last supper as a memorial meal to mark both the death and resurrection of Christ and to bear witness to these events until he returns to call forth his Church. It celebrates the fundamental truths of Christianity and enables believers to express their innermost gratitude for the gift of salvation in the spiritual presence of Jesus. It is a time of deep reflection and silent appreciation whereby believers commune with the Savior through the physical meal of bread and wine and dwell humbly on the unimaginable price that had to be paid to set us free.

 As Dr Ironside said: “It is intended to deepen in the heart of those already saved, the realization of the preciousness of Christ. We come together to remember Him and, as He fills the vision of our souls, we feast in spirit upon all that He is and all that He has done.” “It is the Lord’s desire,” he noted, “that His people often show His death in this way, calling to mind frequently His love and sacrifice for them... We come together to meet the Lord Himself, to be solely occupied with Him, to offer Him the worship of our hearts, and to remember what He passed through for us.... It must be remembered that when we come together for the Lord’s Supper, Christ is as truly present in our midst as He was among the first disciples two thousand years ago.” 

The revelation given to the Apostle Paul The Apostle Paul was not present at the last supper but received an account of this God-given ordinance through direct revelation. According to Dr Ironside, this special revelation, which was given by Jesus after he left the earth, is further evidence of the exceptional spiritual importance of this ordinance and its frequent observance.  “Paul never knew the Lord here on earth, he was not with the Twelve in the upper room when Jesus instituted this ordinance; therefore, he must have received this as a direct revelation from heaven. That is very significant, for there must be something extremely precious to our risen Savior about the frequent observance of the Lord’s Supper if He, the glorified One, gave to His apostle a special declaration from the glory regarding it.” 

It should be clear to even the dullest observer that frequent celebration of the Lord’s Supper is of paramount importance to Christians everywhere. An attempt to curtail or limit the observation of this ordinance, in any manner whatever, is quite obviously a direct attack on the Gospel and on all who believe in Jesus. The Marxists, Freemasons and Babylonian deceivers who control our governments did just that in 2020. Worse still, the organized body of grievous wolves within the institutional church did nothing to oppose them! The Apostle Paul, ceiling mosaic, Ravenna, Italy. 

The vast majority of professing Christians did as Satan commanded in 2020, not what Jesus asked of them. His ordinance was forgotten. They didn’t even grieve over the offense that their disobedience would cause. Three years later we are still waiting for an admission by our preachers, pastors and elders that, through their repeated failure, nay refusal, to rejoice and be glad in the day which the LORD had made, they were willing participants in a terrible act of defiance and hypocrisy. 

Since we have already addressed the immense harm caused by the unconfessed sin of church leaders during this time – see our paper #331 – we will confine our examination to what the Enemy achieved by prohibiting the celebration of the Lord’s Supper. Historical suppression of the Lord’s Supper For nearly two thousand years the visible church assembled and drew great strength, hope and encouragement from its regular observance of a practice instituted by the Lord himself. Even when they were prohibited from doing so by the Roman Emperors, they continued to meet in secret – in contravention of civil law – to celebrate this precious ordinance. 

It is impossible to think of the church over the course of history of failing at any time, for any reason, to honor this ordinance or to accord it the highest respect. All of that changed in 2020. One of the great achievements of the Reformation was the restoration to the laity of the right to receive both the bread and the wine of communion. For many years the church of Rome had restricted the laity to the bread of communion only, while the priests could receive it in both species, bread and wine. It is difficult to establish exactly when this restriction was introduced but it was fairly widespread by the 13th century. 

For instance, the Council of Lambeth (1281) directed that the wine was to be received by the priest only. Luther and other reformers objected to this unscriptural practise and it became a matter of such contention that the Jesuits formally forbade the laity to receive the wine of communion under the draconian regime promulgated by the Council of Trent (1545- 1563). Access to the “chalice” became a rare privilege which the Papacy alone could grant, with special exception being made, for example, for the kings of France at their coronation. 

‘Transubstantiation’ Rome has long used its doctrine of ‘transubstantiation’ – the mystical transformation of the bread and wine of communion into the actual body and blood of Christ – as a powerful means of social control. The liturgical ceremony through which this supposedly miraculous transubstantiation takes place became known as the ‘sacrifice of the Mass’, an event which purports to repeat the sacrifice of Calvary through the supernatural agency of a priest. By this means the church of Rome appropriates to herself the power to add to the work that Jesus performed on Calvary. To engrave this dramatic act in the imagination of parishioners, Rome has turned the bread and wine into objects of adoration. They no longer commemorate the work of Christ on Calvary but constitute divine objects in their own right, produced or made manifest by the miraculous power with which the Catholic priest is allegedly endowed. 

The Jesuits required all Catholics to adore, worship and venerate the ‘consecrated’ bread and wine of communion through the inclusion of the following Canon at the Council of Trent: CANON VI.-If any one saith, that, in the holy sacrament of the Eucharist, Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, is not to be adored with the worship, even external of latria; and is, consequently, neither to be venerated with a special festive solemnity, nor to be solemnly borne about in processions, according to the laudable and universal rite and custom of holy church; or, is not to be proposed publicly to the people to be adored, and that the adorers thereof are idolators; let him be anathema. [Canon VI of the 13th Session] We will not dwell on the sheer madness in all of this. 

We only wish to point out that the Enemy despises the Lord’s Supper and, historically, has done everything he can to pervert its true meaning. Anathema “In councils held at Meaux in 845 and both at Paris and at Epernay the year following, anathema was defined as “condemnation to eternal death.” Thus defined, anathema was too terrible for a bishop to decide upon alone. Only with the consent of his archbishop or his fellow bishops could he impose anathema... 

This unrelenting definition of anathema from the 840s entered into the principal canon law collections: the Decretum compiled by Burchard of Worms at the start of the eleventh century, the Panormia and the Decretum assembled later in the century by Ivo of Chartres, and the Decretum of Gratian in about 1140.” – Lester Little, Cornell University Press, 1993  The Apostolic Church For the first two and half centuries of its existence, the church celebrated the commemorative ordinance known as the Lord’s Supper. 

In doing so, believers reflected on the death and resurrection of Christ, on the awesome magnitude of what his selfless sacrifice had accomplished. They were not only looking back, but forward, to the glorious hour of his imminent return – Maranatha! There was no mystical transformation of any kind, no supernatural activity sponsored by a priest, or anything of that nature. 

The change, such as it was, came only in the hearts of believers as they apprehended anew, in grateful silence, the unspeakable gift of salvation. This is the true apostolic meaning of communion. Fresco in a catacomb in Rome, early second century, showing believers celebrating the Lord’s Supper. 

A carefully planned attack on the apostolic Church Satan hates this ceremony! He knows how deeply it refreshes the souls of all believers! To distract from this awesome truth, he pours in magic and mystery, and beguiles the imagination of his audience with a theological drama. This drama in turn is made possible only through the agency of a priestly hierophant initiated by ‘Mother Church’. Salvation comes through the sanctifying power which he allegedly summons with his sacred words and his ability to effectually reenact the sacrifice of Calvary. 

The carefully planned attack on the church via Covid was nothing less than an outright ban on the Lord’s Supper. It troubles the Enemy that there are still true believers on earth who come together frequently in humble assembly to celebrate the resurrection and imminent return of Christ in accordance with Scripture. 

These people are not deceived by the magic and mystery of transubstantiation or ensnared by the charismatic allure of a sacred object. They only want to do what Jesus asked of them. Impatient to advance toward a ‘new world order’, Satan and his earthly servants issued their anti-Christian prohibition: “Stop! That’s enough!” Nevertheless, they must have been surprised by the success of their brazen scheme. 

There was no need to use force or issue baleful threats. Church leaders raced en mass to lock their doors and play Zoom. As Jesus foretold, these so-called men of God turned out to be hirelings and not shepherds: 8 “But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep. The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep.” (John 10:12-13) As a result of all this, the evangelical church in 2023 is very different from that of 2019. 

The gross hypocrisy of its leaders is plain for all to see, but no-one wants to talk about it. We now know it is led mainly by men who have little or no respect for the Lord’s Supper. There are exceptions of course – praise the LORD! – but the great majority are hireling deceivers. A sweet savour There is a passage of scripture which sheds considerable light on the spiritual significance of the Lord’s Supper, as seen from our Heavenly Father’s perspective: “For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. 

For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.” (1 Corinthians 11:29-30) The Apostle Paul is referring to the unseemly way the Lord’s Supper was celebrated in Corinth and the stern penalty that resulted. In many cases the participants fell ill and continued to suffer the effects for some time, while others died! The Holy Spirit punished these people for their sinful behavior. This is the only place in the New Testament where believers are struck down in this way! The closest parallel is that of Ananias and Sapphira, whose lives were instantly terminated when they lied to the Holy Spirit. The Death of Ananias by Masaccio, 15th century 9 The severity of the punishment reflects the gravity of the sin. 

We cannot say how this principle might apply to leaders and elders who showed little respect for the Lord’s Supper during ‘Covid’, but we have no doubt that it does apply! The Word of God makes this quite plain. We can see this spiritual truth even more clearly in the Old Testament sacrifices. On numerous occasions they are referred to as “a sweet savour unto the LORD”. 

The Hebrew word translated as “savour” in English is rêah meaning a scent or fragrance. When our Heavenly Father accepted a properly constituted offering He was savoring, not the sacrifice itself, but what it represented, namely the sacrifice that Jesus would one day make on Calvary. The love of His Son was deeply pleasing to Him, like a fragrant perfume. 

“Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children; And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour.” – Ephesians 5:1-2 We are saved, not by our own righteousness – for in our fallen condition we stink – but by the sweet, fragrant righteousness of Christ – “For we are unto God a sweet savour of Christ...” (2 Corinthians 2:15). 

Every time we celebrate the Lord’s Supper we are reflecting on the vast gulf between our own wretchedness, our pre-saved sindamaged condition, and the “unsearchable riches of Christ” (Ephesians 3:8) which, in his infinite mercy, he has bestowed upon each of us. How is it possible for any Christian to ignore this ordinance? 

How is it possible for ANY Christian to ignore this ordinance? How? The modern pastors are like the Hebrew priests: “Ye have said, It is vain to serve God: and what profit is it that we have kept his ordinance...” (Malachi 3:14) How is it possible to listen to Marxists and Freemasons – patent agents of Satan – and adopt their wicked reinterpretation of God’s Word? 

How is it possible to submit to their perverted reinvention of standard medical practice and abandon the joy and reverence found in this ordinance? Oh, people will drop dead in the street, they warned! Really? The only thing to fall in the street was truth itself: “And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter.” (Isaiah 59:14) All who had a hand in this should be greatly ashamed. Satan sent his filthy liars to tell their filthy lies and church leaders bowed down before them as though an oracle had spoken. 

They could have taken their flock to a park or a field outside of town to celebrate the Lord’s Supper, but that’s not something hypocrites like to do. Some went instead to the liquor store, where deadly pathogens were miraculously absent. By failing to come together in a humble assembly during ‘Covid’, submitting instead to the dark interdict of a scheming Masonic government, the professing church decided that worldly obedience – however shallow or twisted its rationale – must sometimes take precedence over our faithful expression of joy and gratitude for what Jesus did for us on Calvary. Have no doubt, this was Satan’s work from the start. 

His earthly servants despise Christianity and will continue to do whatever it takes to destroy it. Meanwhile, the church itself, as an institution, has been heavily infiltrated by ‘pastors’ and ‘leaders’ who, with bright smiles and soft words, take pleasure in disobedience, deception, and blasphemy. I truly wish all believers would think deeply about this because it is horrifying. 

Will the great falling away (2 Thessalonians 2:3), when it occurs, be any more reprehensible or loathsome in the eyes of our Heavenly Father than this sinful universal refusal to honor His Son? *** “A son honoureth his father, and a servant his master: if then I be a father, where is mine honour? and if I be a master, where is my fear? saith the LORD of hosts unto you, O priests, that despise my name.

 And ye say, Wherein have we despised thy name? Ye offer polluted bread upon mine altar; and ye say, Wherein have we polluted thee? In that ye say, The table of the LORD is contemptible [This pertains to all the pastors and elders who refused to celebrate the Lord’s Supper during ‘Covid’]. 

And if ye offer the blind for sacrifice, is it not evil? and if ye offer the lame and sick, is it not evil? Offer it now unto thy governor; will he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person? [Is this how you would treat a respected national figure or dignitary?] saith the LORD of hosts.” (Malachi 1:6-8) 11 “Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord hath made ruler over his household [Who is Jesus referring to? The pastors, of course!], to give them meat in due season [To feed the flock]?

 Blessed is that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing. Verily I say unto you, that he shall make him ruler over all his goods. But and if that evil servant shall say in his heart, My lord delayeth his coming; and shall begin to smite his fellowservants [By doing whatever the Masons and Marxists demand], and to eat and drink with the drunken [To take the Covid payments and incentives given by the state]; The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of, and shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” (Matthew 24:45-51) *** “Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.” – 2 Thessalonians 2:15 __________________ Jeremy James Ireland January 14, 2023 12 APPENDIX A Comments on The Lord’s Supper by H A Ironside [Note: The sequence in which the following comments are presented differs slightly from the originals. 

We have also added titles. To consult the full text of the originals, see the links below.] The means by which needy sinners avail themselves of an interest in the finished work of Christ is very simple. The sinner has to take his place before God as a lost, guilty man, owning his iniquity and putting his trust in the Man who died on the cross; for "By Him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by Moses' law." (Acts 13:39) [1] 

Jesus asked that we thus remember him The Lord’s Supper (1 Corinthians 11:20) is a feast of remembrance, which is intended to carry our minds back to the death of our Saviour and also to cause us to look on to His coming again (1 Corinthians 11:26) ... Because of this, and of the expressed desire of Jesus Christ that we should thus remember Him, it has been the joy of Christian hearts down through the centuries to come together around the table of the Lord to think of His sufferings, to meditate upon His love, and to enjoy communion with Him. [5] 

In this New Testament economy Christ is the only sacrificing priest. He is the one all-sufficient victim. Christ, having made atonement for sins, rose from the dead and God has manifested His righteous satisfaction in the work of the cross by seating Him in heaven at His own right hand... [1] Communing with Christ In the celebration of the Lord’s Supper we are to be occupied with Christ Himself, with the memories of His love and grace, recalling His sorrows, sufferings, and death, and bearing in mind His promise to come again and receive us unto Himself. 

It is a mistake to think of this blessed ordinance as a means of grace, in the sense of having to do with the salvation of the soul. It is intended to deepen in the heart of those already saved, the realization of the preciousness of Christ. We come together to remember Him and, as He fills the vision of our souls, we feast in spirit upon all that He is and all that He has done. [5] The Lord's Supper is a memorial feast. 

Christians, members of the body of Christ, come together to remember the One who died for them and who put away their sins, and do this because their sins have been put away. No instructed Christian would approach the Lord's Table to get forgiveness. 

I come because my sins have been forever put away by the atoning blood of the Lord Jesus and I desire gratefully to remember the One who offered that mighty sacrifice and so fitted me for the presence of a holy God. [1]  The Lord’ Supper links the two great facts of Christianity “For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the Lord's death till He come." (1 Corinthians 11:26) Observe how this feast links together the two great facts of Christianity, the death of Christ and His second coming. 

The Lord's Supper is taken in remembrance of One who died, but as we take it we look forward and wait for His coming again... [1] Christ is present in Spirit with his own [We] do not believe that the bread and wine undergo any mystic change, but [we] do believe that as you eat and drink in remembrance of Christ, Christ is present in His sweet and wonderful way, manifesting Himself to the hearts of His beloved people so that by faith they are enabled to feed upon Him. We feed upon Him in remembrance. 

We look back and think of the sorrows He bore. We contemplate His cross and bitter passion, and as we do, we eat of His flesh and drink of His blood... [1] Frequency “Why observe this feast so frequently when, in many places, it is only at rare intervals that what is commonly called ‘the communion’ is celebrated?” In answer we reply that we have, in Scripture, no distinct commandment as regarding the particular times it is to be celebrated. 

The Passover was celebrated once per year, but, when the Lord instituted the Supper, He implied much more frequent observance when He said, “As often as you do this, do it in remembrance of Me.” It is the Lord’s desire that His people often show His death in this way, calling to mind frequently His love and sacrifice for them. In the earliest days of the Church’s history, the Christians broke bread daily; but, when the first days of transition passed, and the new dispensation was fully established, we get the Scriptural example in Acts 20:7, “Upon the first day of the week the disciples came together to break bread and Paul preached unto them.” In Apostolic days, it is well known that this was the recognized custom. 

Now this is not a commandment, but it is a word from the Lord, and He has said, “If a man love Me, he will keep My words.” (John 14:23) A devoted heart does not ask “How seldom can I do this and yet have the Lord’s approval?”, but “What does His Word tell us about the established order in the early days?” The Book answers, “On the first day of the week,” and, therefore, upon that day, we delight to come together to remember Him... [2] 14 We come together to meet the Lord himself It is important to understand that we do not come together to pray, nor yet to preach, nor to sing or listen to teaching, nor to enjoy Christian fellowship. 

We come together to meet the Lord Himself, to be solely occupied with Him, to offer Him the worship of our hearts, and to remember what He passed through for us.... It must be remembered that when we come together for the Lord’s Supper, Christ is as truly present in our midst as He was among the first disciples two thousand years ago. 

Yes, there will be room for praise and for the reading of a portion from the Word of God, which might bring out more vividly the sufferings of Christ. But any brother would be decidedly out of place who sought to give a lengthy exposition of Scripture or an exhortation to the believers. The sense of awe which comes over the soul who recognizes he is in the Lord’s presence will curb the flesh. [2] ...we do believe in the real presence in Spirit of our blessed Lord, for He has said, “Where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them” (Matthew 18:20). 

And there is no time when Christ’s presence is so definitely realized and so distinctly felt as when remembering Him in the breaking of bread. He said, “Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.” 

The Lord’s Supper is a continual reminder of the vicarious character of His death, and that is one reason why our blessed Lord is so desirous that it should be celebrated frequently... [4] A celebration of thanksgiving and expectation In 1 Corinthians 11, verses 23-26, we learn that Paul had received a special revelation regarding the supper, yet fully agreeing with the accounts given by the three evangelists – Matthew, Mark and Luke – only that the thought of the Lord’s return is added to the remembrance of Him in His death: “For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the Lord’s death till He come” (verse 26). 

Thus are the cross and the glory linked together for faith, and ever kept before the soul in this observance of the Lord’s Supper. The word rendered “show” is often translated “preach” in the New Testament. Every celebration of the eucharist (as the early Christians loved to call this feast – a word meaning thanksgiving) is in itself a sermon. It is a proclaiming of the Lord’s death... [3] Never become so occupied with the form that you neglect the spirit of the Lord’s Supper. It is a place for the heart’s affections to flow out. 

Do not make it a ritualistic observance, but let it ever be an occasion where Christ Himself is before the soul, who has said, “This do in remembrance of Me.” [3] Christ, from heaven, emphasized the Lord’s Supper [1 Corinthians 11] Having reproved them for their misbehavior at the Table, Paul lays down clearly the revelation that the risen Christ gave him from heaven concerning the proper observance of this service. 

First, “For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you.” Paul never knew the Lord here on earth, he was not with the Twelve in the upper room when Jesus instituted this ordinance; therefore, he must have received this as a direct revelation from heaven. 

That is very significant, for there must be something extremely precious to our risen Savior about the frequent observance of the Lord’s Supper if He, the glorified One, gave to His apostle a special declaration from the glory regarding it. 

And this is what He told him: “That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread.” Why does the apostle slip in the expression, “In which he was betrayed,” if not for us to realize that the Lord’s Supper was meant to appeal to the hearts of His people and so to remind them that in that very night when our blessed Savior was to know to the fullest the untrustworthiness, the wickedness, the treachery, the perfidy of the human heart, He gave this feast in order that His people might have before them the continual expression of His loving heart in giving Himself for them. ... 

Judas went out, and in his absence the Savior gave this memorial feast to His own. That is very suggestive, for it is only for those who have been redeemed by His precious blood that the Lord’s Supper is given. It is not for the unsaved, it is not for those who are hoping to be saved; it is for those who are in the joy of accomplished redemption, who know Christ as Savior. To them the Lord spake when He took that bread and gave thanks and said, “Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.”

Zephaniah